1. If any provision of this ordinance is declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall not be affected thereby.

2. Advisory Opinions. The Chief Executive Officer of the City, after consulting with the City Attorney, is hereby authorized to give advisory opinions in writing, which shall be binding and shall be adhered to by the police department until the Ordinance is amended in such respect; interpreting terms, phrases, parts or any provision of the Ordinance. Normally, such advisory opinions shall be in response to good faith, signed letters addressed to the Chief Executive Officer or to a member of the City Council questioning the Curfew Ordinance for reasons such as: (1) ambiguity (2) having a potential chilling effect on the constitutional rights specifically invoked, or (3) otherwise invalid, in all three categories with respect to proposed conduct definitely described. This administrative remedy must exhausted prior to presenting to any court a question in any of the three categories. The City Council does not intend a result through the enforcement of this Ordinance that is absurd, impossible execution, or unreasonable. The Council intends that the Ordinance be held inapplicable in such cases, if any, where its application would be unconstitutional under the Constitution of the State of Utah or the Constitution of the United States of America. (Ord. 2000-4, repealed and replaced, 2000)